Evaluation
I felt like these performances went very well. We were able
to bounce off the energy of the large audience and the special effects such as
sound, lighting and the set allowed us to visualise the world we were living
in. At the 4:30 performance, the majority of the audience was our peers which
created a relaxed atmosphere due to their positive reactions to the play and we
were able to bounce off their laughs which made us feel as if we were doing a
very good performance. However we couldn’t rely on this as a truthful reception
as they were our peers and most likely saw us as ourselves not as actors or
characters. This meant that we lost the truth and honesty being our
performances as we played up to the audience and some actors played for laughs.
I think it is very important to not let the audience distract us as this takes
us out of the world of the play, hence stopping us from fully committing to our
character. I felt like my excitement and adrenaline threw me off slightly. I definitely
was effected by this in the first performance which meant I lost the
truthfulness behind my performances, hence making it less believable to the
audience. This hindered my performance as I would lose characterisation and
have to re-immerse myself while making sure I was saying the right line. This
made it difficult to connect to other characters in key moments of the play.
However, there were also many successful aspects of my performance. My voice
was loud enough to be heard due to my good projection and clear diction. This
meant the audience could hear exactly what I was saying and could engage with
my character and follow his storyline. I was also able to use my positioning in
the space well so that everyone could see me, I made sure I would focus my
performance to everyone rather than just one block from the audience. I felt
like we were less excited and had less energy for the second performance. However,
this ended up being beneficial for my performance. I was more relaxed in myself
as a performer and my character. This meant I could take my time and truly
think about the motivation and emotion being my action and dialogue on stage.
This created an honest performance which allowed the audience to see my
character's journey throughout the play. The relationships between me and the
other characters were very clear throughout the play and it was apparent what
my character through of the other characters in each scene. I had induvial reactions
to each character depending on who they were and the circumstances of the
scene. We all actively listened to each other and reacted accordingly making
the relationships feel real and authentic. I reminded myself of the one main
objective I had for each scene as this would drive my characterisation and
motivation.
Brighton
This performance was always going to be a challenge. We were
performing outside in the pavilion and the audience could come and go as they
pleased. On top of this, we had to vocally compete with other singers and
actors who were also performing locally. This meant we has to be very loud if
we wanted to be heard at all, let alone help the audience understand the
complicated plot and Shakespearean language. We accepted there would be
mistakes in this performance and that not everything would go perfectly. I found
that everyone was more concerned with their vocals being heard rather than
their acting or characterisation. This meant that we lost a sense of the
storyline as the subtle things such as facial expressions or exchanging looks
were unclear. I struggled to have good physicality or characterisation and
trusted that I could automatically convey these things to the audience. I would have benefitted from being more
immersed in Benedick as characterisation would be embedded in my mind.
Occasionally, I put too much strain on my voice and this may have damaged it or
made my acting seem unnatural, this would disengage the audience from the
illusion that the dialogue was casual or natural.
